[ Home | Call for Papers | Programme
| Practical Particulars ]
CONFERENCE ON FINITENESS
UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ (GERMANY), May 11-13, 2001
Though routinely employed in the morphological and syntactic analysis
of many languages, if not all, the descriptive content and theoretical
import of the category of finiteness is so unclear as to render it arbitrary
and meaningless. The aim of the conference is to shed light on this category
by focusing on questions such as these:
-
Is FINITENESS an elementary notion or is it defined in terms of more basic
notions (such as marking for tense, mood, person/number/other agreement,
being in construction with a non-oblique subject)?
-
Assuming FINITENESS is not elementary, what are the patterns of more basic
functional categories that render such a derived category meaningful?
(For example, are there systematic correlations between being marked for
tense, mood, person/number/other agreement and being in construction with
a non-oblique subject?)Are such patterns language- particular or are they
universally predictable?
-
What kinds of units can be said to be FINITE or NON-FINITE? words or word
forms? constructions/clauses/sentences? If both, how is the FINITENESS
of words related to that of constructions?
-
As a word category, how does FINITENESS bear on word classes? (Is FINITE
what verbs are, and NON-FINITE what not-so-verby verbs are, with basic
nouns and adjectives unrelated to verbs being outside the scope of this
category altogether?)
-
As a construction category, how does FINITENESS bear on construction classes?(Is
FINITE what sentences and perhaps clauses are, and NON- FINITE what phrases
and perhaps clauses are, if desentential? Further, how do FINITE and NON-FINITE
distribute over main and subordinate clauses?)
-
How do FINITE and NON-FINITE constructions differ as domains for syntactic
rules (e.g., binding, anaphora, case marking)? That is, what is the relationship
between finiteness and syntactic opacity?
-
What about FINITENESS is subject to change?(For example, can finite forms
or constructions become non-finite, and vice versa? If so, what are the mechanisms
of change?
For purposes of this conference the overall angle on such questions ought
to be typological and theoretical: empirically determining crosslinguistic
variation and its limitations ought to be taken as seriously as explaining
what has been found, in whatever theoretical framework.
Invited speakers include:
Elena Kalinina, Moscow State University
Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, University of Stockholm
Jaklin Kornfilt, Syracuse University
David Perlmutter, University of California, San Diego
Presentation will be allotted 30 minutes with additional 15 minutes
for discussion.
Abstract of one page should be submitted by March 30th, 2001. If you
are submitting by regular mail, abstracts should be mailed to: Irina Nikolaeva,
University of Konstanz, Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Fach 175, Konstanz,
D-78457. If submitting electronically, please include the abstract in the
body of the message (do not send attachments!) and send it to: irina.nikolaeva@uni-konstanz.de.
Abstracts should include the author information (author's name and affiliation,
title of the paper, mailing address, and e-mail address).
IMPORTANT DEADLINES:
Submission deadline: March 30th, 2001
Notification of acceptance: April 10th, 2001
Conference organizers:
Irina Nikolaeva
irina.nikolaeva@uni-konstanz.de
Frans Plank
frans.plank@uni-konstanz.de
[ Home | Call for Papers | Programme
| Practical Particulars ]
last updated: 18.4.2001
Thomas Schöneborn